Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla review

Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla already the 20th game in the series, the review will be with spoilers of course. If you haven’t passed the game, I advise you to close the article. We will talk: about the plot, shortcomings, in -game store, Green, critical mistakes of companies. I will warn right away – I could not go through Assassin’s Creed Valhalla. In total, I played it for about 20-30 hours at a slight level of complexity, but even this amount of time was enough for me to evaluate at least half of the available content. This is a huge game that has its advantages, and also cons. Due to spoilers, there will be no article in a thematic sub.

Plot

At the beginning of the game you have the most important choice according to Ubisoft. Choose – a man or a woman: we choose a floor, and you can still not choose anything – then the game, arguing this by the work of the “animus” about what I spoke even before the game is released, in certain scenes he will change the male protagonist to the female, which was not previously in the series. So to speak, your opinion is very important for Ubisoft. Suppose you chose a man how you dared to do it. We are for equality! Next, we go to the main character – I played for a heterosexual man in tight pants. Therefore, the protagonist will be a man.

Aivor – Viking from Norway, who participated in the raids of the Vikings in England. Born in the family of Rosta and Varina, a small settlement in Ryugyalfyulka. During the feast organized by King Sturbjorne, Kyutvyi was in the settlement, as a result of which his parents and numerous residents of the village died. However, Avora saved the son of Sturbjorn, Sigurd. Subsequently, Avor as a child, was adopted by Sturbjorne, who raised him as his own son.

After a while, Avor, along with his members of the Dag clan and Torah, became witnesses to the Kyutvy raid to Rogaland, a settlement on the edge of the territory. Seeing this the opportunity to place the village to his clan, Avor went there to repel the attack of the invaders. During the battle, Viking ran into an enemy who mocked his father’s death, claiming that he died as a coward. In response, Aivor cut his legs and refused to show mercy, depriving him of the death of a warrior and entrance to Valgalla. Leaving his lifeless body with bleeding blood, Aivor went to the rescue of Dagu, who was driven into the corner of the raider Taras.

To my finale, Avor and his clan fled from Norway in the face of endless wars and exhausting resources. They arrived in the southern part of the UK, having founded a new settlement. At some point, Sigurd returned from a long trip to Constantinople and introduced Avora to Assassin Haisam, who gives him an Assassin’s blade. The concern for the weapon, traditionally based on secrecy, can be seen by his enemies, Avor wore the blade on the forearm.

At some point, Aivor https://nodepositbonuscasinos.co.uk/ went to Vinland, where he was buried at the end of his life. In fact, not so exciting. He seems to be, but he is not. It was possible better? Definitely, yes. Do you want to go through the game again, I am extremely doubtful. In my subjective opinion, Ghost of Tsushima from Sucker Punch Productions turned out to be much better in the plot plan. If you compare games in 2020. Who played Ghost of Tsushima will immediately recognize this music.

The main pros and cons of

Definitely, you can praise Ubisoft for adding new mechanics, for example, the development of a settlement that resembles a Monterijoni from Assassin’s Creed 2. For music that plays periodically against the background from the same part. For adding spectacular battles with enemies. And a lot of other things. Why can you criticize ubisoft. This is primarily “repetition of the same action, again and again”. If you expected from Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla a return to the origins of the series, the development of a full -fledged settlement, cutting the in -game store, reduced grind, then this did not happen in the game. Yes, there are attempts. But, they are more for a checkmark and justification of the AC dick. Yes, my words can hurt someone. Well, this is my personal opinion, I played in all parts of the Assassin’s Creed series and I’m already getting old, I can’t surprise me with this. But, I do not think that this is a bad game. It is normal, but for people like me, it is not quite suitable. My opinion, not from the category of “it was better”, but rather “what needs to be done to make it better”.

Intra -game store, EA and ubisoft errors

The unequivocal, most unpleasant minus Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla. For readers, I will explain in more detail. For I meet, there are a lot of people with such an opinion.

And why get used to? What does this chocolate-donte theme bother you? Do not want to – don’t buy. This is not an authentic cosmetics, which is not in the original game. That is, if the game was without a donat, then there was a shmot without this.

And now everything is easy and affordable, you don’t want to waste time – buy. Do not want to buy, then do the “Grind”. And if you do not care about the appearance of armor, horses, etc.p. Well then, just run in the plot and that’s it. Why is it all, everyone plays as he wants and by introducing an in -game store, developers are trying not only to increase their pockets, at the expense of the “lazy”, but also to please the audience who simply does not want to waste time, but is ready to spend money.

Guys, wake up. You paid for the game, and they ask you additional funds for the already spent money for the project. Yes, this is not necessarily. But, this does not justify Ubisoft’s policy. Moreover, this is a plot game without a multiplayer. You will be right, if you say – yes, who are you to tell me where to spend your money. I completely agree with this, but this is not about that. To understand the essence a little, we will plunge into the history of the gaming industry.

EA released Star Wars: Battlefront II at one time and they “screwed up”. People bombed due to microtransactions and terrible balance. EA later released a post on the Reddit forum.

Ea – we did this so that the player receives a sense of pride and achievements. When, something gets in the game.

At the moment, this is the most scandalous news on the topic of microtransactions, it even entered the Guinness Book of Records for the largest minuses on Reddit. Ea later apologized.

Conclusions, do it yourself.

“Grind” as the meaning of life

Fans love to scold Ubisoft and especially the Assassin’s Creed series – Grindilka, Hit, “What does the Assassins have to do with it?”. They simultaneously accuse the franchise of conveyor and at the same time spit from each innovation. But in fact, this is a more superficial stereotype discontent. In the end, if everyone in the world had not loved this franchise so much, it would have long ceased to exist, we will be honest in this regard. I can’t express my full point of view about the “grind” because I played a small number of hours. I am sure there are players who still play Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla, share in the comments about this topic and optimize the game. I will be very, grateful.

Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla is a good game, call it disgusting, I can’t. I would like Ubisoft to revise politics about the in -game store and the series of games in general. For, the game turned out to be good in my opinion. Yes, there are shortcomings, as in any game, but this did not stop her from becoming an “interesting” game. It can be seen how the developers tried. Yes, there are pros and cons of. But, if you evaluate the product as a whole, this is an interesting game for many hours.